<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grow up already people, Windows 8 is not coming out next year!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-277</guid>
		<description>So a new operating system has to be in place for the release date of the chip.   
AMD processors articles report that they  will have 128 registers too.   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/amds-next-gen-bulldozer-is-a-128-bit-crunching-monster.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/am...&lt;/a&gt;   
So do you think a 64 bit OS(which was developed before theses advances) will use the full ability of the Chips? ----Buzz  ...NO   
there is also talk of having a Unified Extensible Firmware interface(UEFI) replacing BIOS   
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm&lt;/a&gt;   
So Microsoft wouldn&#039;t want to lose market share to MAC OS or LINUX, just because they couldn&#039;t produce an OS ready for the launch of new hardware(wait a year or two...the longer the worse it is).    
Hence the launch is most likely accurate....   
Now don&#039;t go blaming M$ for everything Hardware/chip developers have a hand in this too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a new operating system has to be in place for the release date of the chip.<br />
AMD processors articles report that they  will have 128 registers too.<br />
<a href="http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/amds-next-gen-bulldozer-is-a-128-bit-crunching-monster.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/am...</a><br />
So do you think a 64 bit OS(which was developed before theses advances) will use the full ability of the Chips? ----Buzz  ...NO<br />
there is also talk of having a Unified Extensible Firmware interface(UEFI) replacing BIOS<br />
<a href="http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm</a><br />
So Microsoft wouldn&#039;t want to lose market share to MAC OS or LINUX, just because they couldn&#039;t produce an OS ready for the launch of new hardware(wait a year or two...the longer the worse it is).<br />
Hence the launch is most likely accurate....<br />
Now don&#039;t go blaming M$ for everything Hardware/chip developers have a hand in this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tek E 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Tek E 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;Post Continued&gt; 
 
So a new operating system has to be in place for the release date of the chip. 
AMD processors articles report that they  will have 128 registers too. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/amds-next-gen-bulldozer-is-a-128-bit-crunching-monster.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/am...&lt;/a&gt; 
So do you think a 64 bit OS(which was developed before theses advances) will use the full ability of the Chips? ----Buzz  ...NO 
there is also talk of having a Unified Extensible Firmware interface(UEFI) replacing BIOS 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm&lt;/a&gt; 
So Microsoft wouldn&#039;t want to lose market share to MAC OS or LINUX, just because they couldn&#039;t produce an OS ready for the launch of new hardware(wait a year or two...the longer the worse it is).  
Hence the launch is most likely accurate.... 
Now don&#039;t go blaming M$ for everything Hardware/chip developers have a hand in this too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;Post Continued&gt; </p>
<p>So a new operating system has to be in place for the release date of the chip.<br />
AMD processors articles report that they  will have 128 registers too.<br />
<a href="http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/amds-next-gen-bulldozer-is-a-128-bit-crunching-monster.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/15/am...</a><br />
So do you think a 64 bit OS(which was developed before theses advances) will use the full ability of the Chips? ----Buzz  ...NO<br />
there is also talk of having a Unified Extensible Firmware interface(UEFI) replacing BIOS<br />
<a href="http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm" target="_blank">http://www.intel.com/intelpress/sum_efi.htm</a><br />
So Microsoft wouldn&#039;t want to lose market share to MAC OS or LINUX, just because they couldn&#039;t produce an OS ready for the launch of new hardware(wait a year or two...the longer the worse it is).<br />
Hence the launch is most likely accurate....<br />
Now don&#039;t go blaming M$ for everything Hardware/chip developers have a hand in this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeK E 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>TeK E 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe this...how could people discount the possibility??? 
First as a Hardware &amp; software specialist i can tell you it is very possible and most likely true. 
why?.... do you ask, I&#039;ll tell you why, Hardware advances force it to come out. Microsoft works closely with Hardware developers, They are told the release date for hardware(under NDA) and what will be needed in a few years. 
Intel for instance will be releasing gulftown processor this year(32nm), then Sandy bridge(32nm in 2011), then Ivy Bridge(22nm),then haswell (in 2012). 
Haswell is reported to have 128 bit registers (maybe 128bit processor) and 256bit  vector registers(ivy big has this too).  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t believe this...how could people discount the possibility???<br />
First as a Hardware &amp; software specialist i can tell you it is very possible and most likely true.<br />
why?.... do you ask, I&#039;ll tell you why, Hardware advances force it to come out. Microsoft works closely with Hardware developers, They are told the release date for hardware(under NDA) and what will be needed in a few years.<br />
Intel for instance will be releasing gulftown processor this year(32nm), then Sandy bridge(32nm in 2011), then Ivy Bridge(22nm),then haswell (in 2012).<br />
Haswell is reported to have 128 bit registers (maybe 128bit processor) and 256bit  vector registers(ivy big has this too).<br />
<a href="http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html" target="_blank">http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeK E 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>TeK E 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe this...how could people discount the possibility??? 
First as a Hardware &amp; software specialist i can tell you it is very possible and most likely true. 
why?.... do you ask, I&#039;ll tell you why, Hardware advances force it to come out. Microsoft works closely with Hardware developers, They are told the release date for hardware(under NDA) and what will be needed in a few years. 
Intel for instance will be releasing gulftown processor this year(32nm), then Sandy bridge(32nm in 2011), then Ivy Bridge(22nm),then haswell (in 2012). 
Haswell is reported to have 128 bit registers (maybe 128bit processor) and 256bit  vector registers(ivy big has this too).  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t believe this...how could people discount the possibility???<br />
First as a Hardware &amp; software specialist i can tell you it is very possible and most likely true.<br />
why?.... do you ask, I&#039;ll tell you why, Hardware advances force it to come out. Microsoft works closely with Hardware developers, They are told the release date for hardware(under NDA) and what will be needed in a few years.<br />
Intel for instance will be releasing gulftown processor this year(32nm), then Sandy bridge(32nm in 2011), then Ivy Bridge(22nm),then haswell (in 2012).<br />
Haswell is reported to have 128 bit registers (maybe 128bit processor) and 256bit  vector registers(ivy big has this too).<br />
<a href="http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html" target="_blank">http://www.dvhardware.net/article29056.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 8 could just be a Service Pack for Windows 7 &#124; Windows8update - Comprehensive Windows 8 News and Information</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 8 could just be a Service Pack for Windows 7 &#124; Windows8update - Comprehensive Windows 8 News and Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] addition, like I mentioned in my last article, the corporate world needs time to perform enterprise wide tech refreshes and time for those new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] addition, like I mentioned in my last article, the corporate world needs time to perform enterprise wide tech refreshes and time for those new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-87</guid>
		<description>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-88</guid>
		<description>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2010/01/30/grow-up-already-people-windows-8-is-not-coming-out-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=1086#comment-86</guid>
		<description>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind. 
 
And yes, Chrome OS is a real threat. look at how successful Microsoft have been in fending off other attacks (Browser, MP3 player, Search engine)..should I go on? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but you have to remember that MSFT can&#039;t take the success of Windows 7 for granted. They need to keep developing or get left behind. </p>
<p>And yes, Chrome OS is a real threat. look at how successful Microsoft have been in fending off other attacks (Browser, MP3 player, Search engine)..should I go on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

