<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 8 release set for 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windows8update.com/2009/11/19/windows-8-release-set-for-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2009/11/19/windows-8-release-set-for-2012/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tovy Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.windows8update.com/2009/11/19/windows-8-release-set-for-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-11984</link>
		<dc:creator>Tovy Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windows8update.com/?p=113#comment-11984</guid>
		<description>I think releasing Windows 8 in 2011 would seem rushed especially with the success of Windows 7 so far. With SP1 just being released I would think they could wait. Of course with a business model that requires new products to drive profit, I&#039;m sure they will rush it to market as soon as possible. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think releasing Windows 8 in 2011 would seem rushed especially with the success of Windows 7 so far. With SP1 just being released I would think they could wait. Of course with a business model that requires new products to drive profit, I'm sure they will rush it to market as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

